The True Cost of Plastics and Why This Conversation Matters

As the Manager of Circularity & Customer Engagement, part of my role is to spark dialogue, to challenge how we think about materials, waste, and value. Often, that means sharing thought-provoking research and articles with our teams and customers to inspire new ideas and perspectives.

Recently, I came across a report titled The Social Cost of Plastic to the United States. It was featured in a striking piece by Shannon Kelleher in The New Lede and uncovers the immense hidden costs tied to our reliance on plastics, not just environmentally, but personally, socially and economically as well.

As Nancy Lauer, staff scientist at the Duke Environmental Law and Policy Clinic and one of the report’s authors, explained: “What’s the connection between soil loss and plastic pollution? The prices that consumers pay for plastic products don’t tell the whole story of their costs. Fossil fuel subsidies keep plastics relatively inexpensive in the United States. But as our report reveals, the true economic, environmental and health costs to society are far greater.”

After reading it, I shared the article with Todd West, our Regional Sales Manager for New England. His reaction said it all: “Why isn’t this on the landing page of our website, on every social media post and correspondence we send out?!”

And you know what? He is right! Why isn’t it? These insights should be shared in every conversation we are having about sustainability, innovation, and responsibility. With a quick AI takeaway, I was convinced. Here are some key points worth knowing:

AI Takeaways: The Hidden Costs of Plastics

• Human health impacts: Estimated at $930 billion annually, factoring in healthcare costs, premature deaths, productivity losses, and the health effects of fossil fuel extraction for plastic production.
• Environmental costs: Additional expenses come from greenhouse gas emissions (~$16 billion per year), contributing to extreme weather events, marine industry impacts, and landfilling plastic and litter cleanup.
• Conservative estimates: The total cost range ($436 billion to $1.1 trillion) is likely understated due to data gaps.
• Distorted pricing: Fossil fuel subsidies keep plastics cheap for consumers while concealing their broader societal costs.
• Health concerns: During use, plastics shed microplastics and leach harmful chemicals, posing health risks linked to various diseases.
• Policy and pushback: Legislative efforts to curb plastic use face strong opposition from industry groups, which highlight plastics’ economic and societal benefits, including contributions to GDP and job creation.

Industry stance: The American Chemistry Council advocates for better management and recycling, rather than eliminating materials they see as vital to modern life.

Todd’s reaction and this report remind us of a bigger truth. The impacts of plastics are not just environmental – they are economic, ethical, and personal. When we take plastic out of the sustainability conversation and instead link it to health, cost, and community well-being, the full picture emerges and the need for change becomes impossible to ignore.

So, what do you think? Where should these insights be front and center – in our sustainability conversations? On our homepage? Tell us how you would like to see World Centric show up for a better world.